In a presentation, Rice University’s Baker Institute scholars have looked at patenting activity over the past few decades, government funding in R&D, and potential impacts on renewable energy. Their conclusion is surprising: Lower government funding in renewable energy reflects R&D’s declining productivity (based on patents) rather than lack of support.
While more details are necessary for a full evaluation, we are skeptical of their preliminary conclusion for several reasons including:
- Patents are not the best indicator of R&D productivity (as the authors also acknowledge)
- Patenting frequency has fallen significantly over the years due to prosecution times and costs
- Government funding decisions are typically not sophisticated enough to reflect patenting activity
Thoughts?